Comments on the ISA are accepted year-round, and changes are made to the web version of the ISA frequently throughout the year, based on comments and other changes to the health IT standards environment as ONC becomes aware of them. An annual Review and Comment period also occurs each summer-fall, when a majority of comments are received. See the process timeline below for more details.
Annual ISA Process Timeline
- January: Current Year Reference Edition is published, web version of ISA is available for ongoing review and comments.
- Winter/Spring/Summer: Changes may be made to the web-version of the ISA throughout the year, while the ISA Reference Edition remains static.
- Late Summer/Early Fall: Annual Review and Comment Period opens for sixty days - site changes are on hold so all reviewers are seeing the same content.
- Fall: ONC and HHS staff review comments received, make site updates and prepare the following year's Reference Edition for publication by early January.
How to Comment on the ISA
- An ISA site account is required in order to comment on the ISA.
- If you have an account already, click the "Login" button at the top right of the ISA.
- To create an account, click the "Login" button, then "Create new account" tab above the login window. Account approval is required, and is generally completed within 1 - 24 hours.
- Once you're authenticated to the ISA site, you can submit comments on most ISA pages - just scroll to the bottom of the relevant page, enter the text of your comment (or provide attachments, if needed) and submit. Your comment will be reviewed by ONC or other HHS subject matter experts, and changes will be considered for publication to the ISA.
- While comments by topic (posted to individual Interoperability Need pages) are preferred, and allow greater visibility to your comments by other industry stakeholders, consolidated comment letters are also accepted. You may provide these comments on general information pages, and ONC staff will triage them, and assign them to subject matter experts.
Comment
Submitted by jeffcoughlin on
Organization and Usability of ISA
ISA is a critical resource to the community as we move forward with broader data exchange across the healthcare ecosystem. HIMSS thanks ONC for ISA’s new section organization and the clarity that it provides with the removal of section numbers and clearer naming and alphabetizing. However, there are still some issues with not being able to access major sections of ISA, specifically around the new “Specialty Care and Settings” section. HIMSS recommends that ONC take several steps to maximize the value of ISA to community stakeholder supporting these efforts.
Overall, ONC should work to promote and highlight ISA through additional means. Creation of additional infographics that explain the purpose and benefits of utilizing ISA would be helpful. Organizations like HIMSS could share those resources with our members and provide another opportunity to drive more utilization of ISA. It may also be helpful to create brief video tutorials that provide examples of how different entities can access, use, and leverage ISA that furthers the goals of the program. These resources could also point to previous ISA Reference Editions that are important for stakeholders to understand and see how standards have evolved over the course of several years to meet the requirements of the community.
Another opportunity to better promote ISA is to ensure robust alignment with USCDI as well as other interoperability efforts underway across ONC. ONC has an opportunity to cross-reference both ISA and USCDI in each resource document to help ensure better alignment. There is also an opening for improved mapping across the USCDI data classes and ISA interoperability needs. We see a clear overlap that could be of value to the community for greater understanding of associated standards within the interoperability need. For example, there is a USCDI data set for clinical notes as well as an ISA interoperability need for that topic. Cross-linking can raise awareness of both and help consider additional standards/needs associated with each data element or use case.
In addition, we recommend ONC explore the concept of establishing a common evaluation process for ISA and USCDI on an annual basis, as a way of helping the community draw stronger connections between the resources. Moreover, the idea of creating an ISA infographic resource could further tighten the linkages between ISA and USCDI by comparing and contrasting different sets of standards and describing what they have in common, where they diverge, and other distinguishing factors.
Finally, in terms of the organization of ISA and the “Appendix II – Models and Profiles” section, we ask ONC to update the link to our new Interoperability in Healthcare Guide on the HIMSS webpage for a discussion on different types of standards.
Submitted by juliemaas on
UDAP.org ISA Comments 2020
Thank you for considering the attached comments.
Submitted by bgradl@eatright.org on
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Comments on 2020 ISA
On behalf of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, thank you for the opportunity to provide our feedback on the Interoperability Standards Advisory.
Annual ISA Review November 2020 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.pdf
Submitted by Albert Taylor on
Thank you for your comment…
Thank you for your comment and input. Please see ISA page https://www.healthit.gov/isa/representing-patient-allergies-and-intolerances-food-substances which cites the VSAC value set "Common dietary substances for allergy and intolerance documentation" located at https://vsac.nlm.nih.gov/valueset/2.16.840.1.113762.1.4.1186.3/expansion/Latest.
Submitted by mdoan on
FEHRM Comments on ISA
On behalf of the Federal Electronic Health Record Modernization (FEHRM) Program Office, we appreciated the opportunity to comment on the Interoperability Standards Advisory (ISA).
Submitted by wanda.govan-je… on
Thank you
Thank you for your 3 comments. No action at this time.
Submitted by ScottStuewe on
DirectTrust Comments
DirectTrust is pleased to be able to provide comments on the Interoperability Standards Advisory. Thanks.
Submitted by msaito on
Epic's Comments on the 2021 Interoperability Standards Advisory
Please see the attached document. Thank you for your consideration.
Submitted by mvldougherty on
CMS Data Element Library HITWG Comments to ONC on ISA
Comments on the ONC Interoperability Standards Advisory submitted on behalf of the CMS Data Element Library Health IT Workgroup.
Submitted by Solarf3050 on
HL7 Comments for ONC ISA 2021 Reference Edition
Please see HL7's updated comments on the ISA 2021 Reference Edition. It contains an additional recommendation each under the following sections:
(Page 3)
Sharable Clinical Decision Support:
https://www.healthit.gov/isa/sharable-clinical-decision-support
(Page 10)
Providing Patient-Specific Assessments and Recommendations Based on Patient Data for Clinical Decision Support:
https://www.healthit.gov/isa/providing-patient-specific-assessments-and-recommendations-based-patient-data-clinical-decision
Thank you.
HL7 Response ISA Letter 11 12.20 FINAL v2.docx