Type | Standard / Implementation Specification | Standards Process Maturity | Implementation Maturity | Adoption Level | Federally required | Cost | Test Tool Availability |
---|
Limitations, Dependencies, and Preconditions for Consideration |
Applicable Value Set(s) and Starter Set(s)
|
---|---|
|
|
Comment
Submitted by michael.e.prevoznik on
Comments for 2021 Reference Edition publication of the ONC (ISA)
Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated collaborated with the American Clinical Laboratory Association (ACLA) to develop 2021 Reference Edition ISA comments (http://www.acla.com/). We support the comments submitted by ACLA. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments.
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comments
NCPDP supports ONC’s recommendations.
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comment
- Modify the following:
Type-Change to: Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- HL7 Implementation Guide for C-CDA Release 2.1: Consolidated CDA for Clinical Notes and C-CDA on FHIR® R4
- Modify the following:
Type-Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- NCPDP Specialized Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 2017071
Implementation Maturity- Production
Submitted by michael.e.prevoznik on
Comments for 2021 update of the ONC Interoperability Standards A
Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated collaborated with the American Clinical Laboratory Association (ACLA) to develop 2021 ISA comments (http://www.acla.com/). We support the comments submitted by ACLA.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments.
Submitted by pwilson@ncpdp.org on
NCPDP Comment
- Add the following:
Type-Emerging Standard
Standard Implementation/Specification- HL7 Implementation Guide for C-CDA Release 2.1: Consolidated CDA for Clinical Notes and C-CDA on FHIR R4
Standards Process Maturity – Final
Implementation Maturity- Production
Adoption Level – 1
Federally Required – No
Cost – $
Test Tool Availability – No
Available – Spring 2020
- Add the following:
Type-Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- NCPDP SCRIPT Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 2017071
Standards Process Maturity – Final
Implementation Maturity- Production
Adoption Level – 1
Federally Required – No
Cost – $
Test Tool Availability – Yes
Test Tool Link: https://tools.ncpdp.org/erx/#/home
- Add the following:
Type-Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- NCPDP SCRIPT Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 10.6
Standards Process Maturity – Final
Implementation Maturity- Production
Adoption Level – 2
Federally Required – Yes
Cost – $
Test Tool Availability – Yes
Test Tool Link: https://tools.ncpdp.org/erx/#/home
- Add the following:
Type-Implementation Specification
Standard Implementation/Specification- NCPDP Specialized Standard, Implementation Guide, Version 2017071
Standards Process Maturity – Final
Implementation Maturity- Pilot
Adoption Level – 1
Federally Required – Yes
Cost – $
Test Tool Availability – Yes
Test Tool Link: https://tools.ncpdp.org/erx/#/home
Submitted by Riki Merrick on
Update to the most recent version of LRI
Please update to point to the most recent version:
HL7 Version 2.5.1 Implementation Guide: Lab Results Interface (LRI) Release 1, STU Release 3 - US Realm
Link to specification = http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/standards/dstu/V251_IG_LRI_R1_STU3_2018JUN.pdf
Link to DSTU comment page = https://www.hl7.org/dstucomments/showdetail.cfm?dstuid=226
Value Set IG:
Link to specification = http://www.hl7.org/documentcenter/public/standards/dstu/V2_IG_VALUESETS_R1_STU3_2018JUN.zip
For comments on the Value set Companion guide, please submit DST comments under the guide that the vocabulary belongs to - if for the document itself, just pick one of the guides and submit there with the reference to the companion guide document and page number/section or applicable spreadsheet
Submitted by jkegerize on
ACLA ISA comment re: added text and definition of harmonization
This text was added under Limitations, Dependencies, and Preconditions for Consideration: “Laboratory test results may require additional information beyond the result value for correct handling and interpretation, including units, reference range, harmonization status of the test, and identifiers for device, test kit, kit version, reagent lot, and calibrator lot. Not all of these elements are included in current messaging standards for the full result reporting path. See “Representing Laboratory Values/Results.”
Please clarify the term “harmonization status”. We suggest this term be removed until it can be further clarified for expected implementation, clearly measured, etc. It is too nebulous as currently stated. For example, can it be measured and if so, how is it validated and how does it relate to the laboratory test results or provider’s EHR system laboratory test results?
Please review the “Applicable Security Patterns for Consideration” applicability to the section and if not applicable, remove. This would be more appropriate in an introductory section. This change, if approved, might be applied throughout the document.