{"id":165460,"date":"2021-06-28T22:16:27","date_gmt":"2021-06-28T22:16:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beta.healthit.gov\/dashboard_stats\/effects-meaningful-use-functionalities-health-care-quality-safety-and-efficiency-0\/"},"modified":"2026-02-20T16:02:10","modified_gmt":"2026-02-20T21:02:10","slug":"effects-meaningful-use-functionalities-health-care-quality-safety-and-efficiency-0","status":"publish","type":"quick-stat","link":"https:\/\/healthit.gov\/data\/quickstats\/effects-meaningful-use-functionalities-health-care-quality-safety-and-efficiency-0\/","title":{"rendered":"Effects of Meaningful Use Functionalities on Health Care Quality, Safety and Efficiency, By Author Sentiment (% of Studies)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Systematic Review of Literature from 2007-2013<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Graphic visualizes Health IT evaluation studies, 2007-2013 (n=493), related to the impact of Meaningful Use functionality on the quality, efficiency, and safety of care (or aspects of care). Positive defined as health IT improved key aspects of care but none worse off; Mixed-positive defined as positive effects of health IT outweighed the negative effects; Neutral defined as health IT not associated with change in outcome; Negative defined as negative effects of health IT on outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Percent of Meaningful Use Functionality Impacts on Quality, Safety, and Efficiency by Author Sentiment<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/div>\n